Archive for the ‘Web 2.0’ Category

Improving Search Engine Rankings: Data and Decisionmaking (part 2)

Saturday, October 10th, 2009

Another vital set of information we collect and analyze to help determine our search engine optimization strategies for our clients are our keyword ranking reports. These reports are generated on a weekly basis automatically and give us information about the relative keyword performance of those terms that we’re tracking. On the most basic of levels, getting an idea of movement from month to month allows us to track the effects of the work we’ve done on where the webpages of our clients appear in user’s browsers when they search on Google, Yahoo! and MSN/Bing. The report is simply superficially informative: that is, it tells the reader where their site is from the top down, and its ranking movement over a period of time specified in the settings. It does not give information such as relative competitiveness of the keyword term, nor does it detail how many searches are executed for those keywords in a given period of time (we have other nifty tools for that data!).

However, what this report does inform us about is the potential to act upon heretofore untouched or underloved opportunities. If a particular permutation of an important keyword is ranked #13 (meaning top-middle of the second set of results on a normal 10-result search results page) in a specific cycle, and we have been concentrating efforts on the seed keyword it contains (ie, ‘information technology’ and ‘information technology management’ or ‘information technology consulting’), we can see where we need to focus our efforts to bolster those associated terms that very well may be more in tune with what the searching user/potential customer has in mind– and this translates into targeted traffic that has necessarily carries with it specific interest in what they’ve searched. That kind of targeted result to a targeted search is the best kind of breeding ground for sales and increased conversion rates.

We send these reports to those we work with on a cyclical basis to enable them to gauge the results that our efforts have yielded for themselves in terms of the search engine optimization services we provide and the economy and their sector of industry as a whole. We always are interested in addressing any and all concerns of our clients in terms of branding, marketing strategies (especially those that coincide with traditional print/airwave advertising as well), and their upcoming and underpromoted products and services among many other considerations. We also review the data collected by our reporting tools on a weekly (sometimes daily!) basis to further inform our decisionmaking processes as we move through each cycle.

As Search Placement’s Web Analyst, I find that working with and gaining understanding from the data we collect and utilize for our work is incredibly rewarding as a growing and educational experience– I look forward to meeting new clients and tackling new projects in new niches.

Improving Search Engine Rankings: Data and Decisionmaking

Wednesday, July 1st, 2009

There are a tremendous number of factors at play in determining the success and health of a website, particularly if that website is the web presence of a retailer or organization with something to sell. As entrepreneurs, we want our businesses to perform the best that they can, and we are generally willing to do what it takes to improve in any areas we find in need of bolstering. An incredibly important aspect of being able to make a determination as to what areas in your search engine optimization campaign could benefit the most from is harnessing and understanding data collected from various sources that relates to your website: traffic flow, back link status, and keyword ranking status being three primary cyclical reporting methods that can be analyzed and put to good use to boost organic search engine rankings. This post will be primarily concerned with traffic flow (as it relates to organic search engine placement), with subsequent posts to follow detailing the other major reporting types and how they benefit the clients we’re associated with.

Our experience working with web analytics and diagnosis tools such as Google Analytics and Google Webmasters allows us to make informed decisions regarding the choice of resource allocation in a given cycle that yield the best possible results for the keywords we are focusing on together. These reporting tools allow us to see data such as where the flow of traffic is coming from; organic search engines, pay-per-click advertising, direct traffic, referrals, and so forth. In addition, one of the features of this report allows us to see which keywords have been driving that traffic to the website in question and we can then bolster efforts thereon– or spot a ripe opportunity to pick! The reports generated by these tools also allow us to gauge the results our efforts have borne during that cycle and the one(s) preceding it (although it should be noted that some of the effects of our organic search engine optimization methods are exhibited not only in the short, but also medium and long-term) relative to traffic flow overall.

We use another set of analytical tools to help intially determine what will best improve search engine rankings when we get started with new clients, but for month to month focii and performance tracking web analytics tools are where it’s at. Thankfully both the web and these tools have become robust enough in recent years to glean accurate impressions from relatively complete data sets (for example, compare Google Analytics/Omniture/WebTrends web data to a Nielsen TV survey in terms of accurately capturing the whole) that allow us to gain actionable insights that ultimately strengthen our clients’ projects.

The caveat, of course, is that truly informed decisions cannot be based on one set of data alone. In the near future, I’ll write about some of the other tools we use to track results over time and enhance search engine ranking performance for those we work with– check back soon!

Google Wave: Making A Splash in the World of Communication

Wednesday, June 17th, 2009

Google has recently shown off an amazing new product out of it’s labs: Google Wave. The hour-plus long demo is actually captivating the whole time through, in part because of the exciting new methods of streamlining and optimizing of so many communications protocols and technologies. It may be a long watch, but I heartily recommend the viewing for anyone that is interested in where the web is going relative to where it has come from in terms of mass user adopted messaging and communications standards of today and the recent past.

Waves can serve to replace traditional emails in that they allow users participating in the Wave to reply to the message sent by a familiar thread-like response system. Waves can also replace instant messaging chat dialogs in that responses and changes made to the wave can be seen in real time. Waves support embedded video, images, widgets, and more– they can be collaboratively edited like documents and by proxy can be easily adapted for wiki-like use as well as blogging and live blogging. In the demo, users subscribed to the blog on which the Wave was published could respond as the blogger was blogging! This obviously holds great potential value for business efficiency not only in meetings and the dissemination of information across an organizational body, but also in planning, coordination, and implementation of data driven perogatives– especially once the spreadsheet collaboration capabilities go live shortly after public release.

Another fascinating aspect of Google Wave that particularly relates to Search Engine Optimization and Search Engine Marketing Services is that it can be used interactively and extensibly with existing social networking technologies, such as Twitter. A Wave and a Tweet can work synchronously in a manner that produces a ‘Twave’, a thread-like conversation comprised of both contributions to the Wave, the Twitter page of the participants, and any and all Twitter clients involved.

What will be interesting to see is exactly to what degree users embrace this new avenue for communication and collaboration. From what can be seen in the demo even the fledgling iterations showcased seem to make exciting use of the strengths inherent to Google Wave, and given that the code is open-sourced, we’ll be getting our hands on even more implementations of the exciting new Wave technology. Will end users abandon their comfortable emailing/messaging/blogging/Twittering clients in light of the unified and concentrated communicative capabilities of a more robust and established Google Wave? Time will tell…

Thomas Vander Wal At DCampSouth

Tuesday, June 5th, 2007

This weekend local web developers and internet enthusiasts gathered at the School of Communication Arts in Raleigh, NC for this year’s DCampSouth. DCampSouth is a BarCamp, or “unconference”, where rather than having scheduled speakers, everyone pitches sessions the morning of the BarCamp. Those sessions are put on a schedule, and lots of little groups form for intense group learning. Everyone is expected to teach, to talk, to participate.

Keynote speaker, Thomas Vander Wal opened up the day with a speech on the progression of how we interact with the web, social networking communities, and folksonomy among other things. According to Vander Wal, the original “I go get web” model of the internet consists of a person accessing the web through a single device (their desktop) and actively seeking information. The newer “come to me web” is much more complex, involving many individuals interacting with each other and via numerous devices (laptops, blackberries, etc.). The central characteristic of the “come to me web” is our ability to save important information and streamline the retrieval process according to our own taxonomy (enter tags and folksonomy). No longer are we expected to navigate through layers of webpages before we finally connect with what we are looking for. As the web develops, more and more information is being delivered to us based on our preferences and online behavior (enter social communities, RSS feeds, and yes….more tagging). The overall model is shifting from navigation to attraction and the new web is multiplying the power of the internet instead of adding it.

Additional information on the conference and Vander Wal is available here, here, and here.